Leadership Recruiting Fundamentals
When Should You Use a Leadership Recruiting Firm?
By Mark Jones
Founder & Managing Director
Leadership Recruiting Fundamentals
A six-part guide to building stronger leadership teams
✓ What Is Leadership Recruiting?
✓ Leadership Recruiting vs. Executive Search
✓ Why Leadership Recruiting Is Different
✓ When Should You Use a Leadership Recruiting Firm? (Current Guide)
✓ How Long Does Leadership Recruiting Take
✓ How to Choose a Leadership Recruiting Firm
Complete this series to understand the fundamentals of leadership recruiting.
When Should You Use a Leadership Recruiting Firm?
Not every leadership opening requires a recruiting firm.
Some organizations have strong internal recruiting teams, established talent networks, and enough market visibility to fill certain leadership positions effectively on their own. In those situations, bringing in an outside firm may add little value.
But some searches are different.
The position may have been open for months. The people applying aren’t the people you want to hire. The strongest candidates are working for competitors and aren’t looking at job postings. A previous hire may not have worked out. Or the position may be important enough that settling for the best available candidate simply isn’t an acceptable outcome.
Those are the situations where an outside search can make a difference.
The question isn’t simply whether you can recruit the position internally. It is whether your current recruiting process gives you access to the people you should be considering.
At a Glance
ou should consider using a leadership recruiting firm when:
-
The position will have a significant impact on the business.
-
The people you most want to reach are probably already employed and not actively looking.
- The search has produced applicants but few candidates you would seriously consider hiring.
- The position has remained open longer than expected.
-
You’re hiring for experience your organization doesn’t recruit for very often.
- Confidentiality is important.
- A previous search or hire has failed.
- Your internal recruiting team does not have the time or resources to conduct a targeted search.
-
The cost of getting the hire wrong is much greater than the cost of conducting a broader search.
As the position becomes more important and the right candidates become harder to find, relying primarily on applicants becomes less effective.
When the People You Want Aren’t Applying
Most hiring processes start the same way. The company posts the position and waits to see who applies.
That can work well when enough qualified people are actively looking.
Leadership recruiting often works in the opposite direction.
Many strong candidates are already employed, doing well and reasonably happy where they are. They aren’t spending their evenings searching job boards.
That doesn’t mean they wouldn’t consider another opportunity.
But they may listen if the opportunity gives them something they don’t have today - more responsibility, a better opportunity, ownership potential, or simply a more interesting challenge.
But somebody has to find that person and start the conversation.
That is one of the differences between posting a position and conducting a leadership search.
When You’re Getting Applicants but Not Candidates
A large applicant pool can create the impression that a recruiting effort is working.
It may not be.
I’ve seen searches where an organization received dozens or even hundreds of applications but still didn’t have three people it genuinely wanted to interview.
Applicant volume and candidate quality are two very different things.
That’s especially true in leadership hiring, where a resume can look much better than the candidate actually fits the position. Someone may have the right title but have worked in a much larger organization where responsibilities were distributed across several departments. Another candidate may have impressive tenure but little evidence of building teams, leading change, or operating in the environment the new position requires.
The issue isn’t whether qualified people exist.
It is whether the recruiting process is reaching them.
When weeks of advertising continue producing variations of the same candidates, posting the job on another website rarely solves the problem. At that point, you need to stop waiting for applicants and start looking for people.
When the Position Has Been Open Too Long
At some point, leaving an important position open starts costing more than doing something different to fill it.
Work gets redistributed. Decisions are delayed. Other leaders absorb responsibilities they weren’t hired to handle. Employees become frustrated. Sales opportunities can be missed. Strategic initiatives lose momentum.
Meanwhile, the organization can become accustomed to the vacancy.
That’s dangerous.
After a position has been open long enough, hiring teams sometimes start lowering the bar just to get the search finished. Requirements that once seemed essential become negotiable. A candidate who would have been considered marginal three months earlier suddenly begins looking acceptable.
If a leadership position has stayed open despite a reasonable recruiting effort, doing more of the same probably isn’t going to change the result. It’s time to change the search.
When the Hire Is Too Important to Get Wrong
Some hiring mistakes are inconvenient.
Leadership hiring mistakes can change organizations.
The wrong leader can lose good employees, damage customer relationships, weaken accountability, make poor strategic decisions, or spend months taking the organization in the wrong direction.
There’s another cost that’s harder to measure: what the business isn’t accomplishing while the wrong person is in the job.
Then the organization has to start over.
That’s one reason I think about using a leadership recruiting firm partly in terms of risk.
If the position affects revenue, operations, employees, customers or the direction of the business, it’s worth knowing whether better candidates exist beyond the people who happened to apply.
The objective isn’t to eliminate hiring risk. No recruiting process can do that.
The goal is to make the decision after you’ve seen the strongest group of candidates you can reasonably reach.
When You’re Hiring Outside Your Normal Area of Expertise
Internal recruiting teams are often very good at filling the kinds of positions their companies hire all the time.
The challenge comes when the company needs something different.
The company may be hiring its first CFO, opening a new division, building a new function, entering another market, or looking for a leader with specialized industry experience.
Suddenly, the usual candidate network may not be enough.
That’s when you have to understand the market. Which companies have people with the right experience? What titles do they actually use? How much responsibility do those people really have? Who has already done something similar to what this position requires?
This is where research and sourcing become particularly important.
The search shouldn’t be limited to people who already describe themselves exactly the way the job description does.
Some of the strongest candidates won’t.
When Your Internal Team Doesn’t Have the Capacity for a Complex Search
Using a leadership recruiting firm does not necessarily mean the internal recruiting team has failed.
Sometimes it means they have other jobs to do.
A targeted leadership search requires time.
Someone has to identify target companies, research people, review backgrounds, approach candidates individually, follow up when they don’t respond, have the initial conversations, evaluate interest and keep good candidates engaged through the interview process.
That is very different from managing inbound applicants.
An internal recruiter supporting dozens of openings may simply not have the capacity to devote that level of attention to one position.
There is another practical consideration: passive candidates don’t always move according to the company’s hiring timetable.
They need conversations. They ask questions. They compare the opportunity with what they would be giving up. They may have bonuses, equity, projects, or personal commitments affecting when they can move.
Good leadership recruiting requires someone to stay engaged throughout that process.
When Confidentiality Matters
Some leadership searches cannot be advertised publicly.
An incumbent may still be in the position. A planned organizational change may not yet have been announced. The company may be entering a new market, replacing a senior leader, or making a strategic move it does not want competitors to know about.
You can’t recruit those positions the same way you would a public opening.
Instead of advertising the position, candidates have to be identified and approached selectively.
Confidential searches also require judgment about what information is disclosed, when it is disclosed, and how candidates are moved through the process.
The search needs to create enough interest for a strong candidate to engage without compromising the organization.
When You’ve Already Made the Wrong Hire Once
A failed leadership hire should change the next search.
Unfortunately, organizations sometimes respond by simply reopening the same job description and starting the same recruiting process again.
That misses the lesson.
Before searching for another candidate, I want to understand why the previous hire didn’t work.
Was the problem technical capability? Leadership style? Pace? Culture? Expectations? The size of the organization? An inability to operate without the resources available at a previous employer?
Or did the organization hire someone who interviewed well but had never actually faced the challenges this position requires?
The answers should change who you look for and how you evaluate the next candidate.
If you don’t understand why the first hire failed, you risk making the same mistake again.
When Hiring Manager Indecision Is Slowing the Search
Not every difficult search is a sourcing problem.
Sometimes the company is the bottleneck.
I’ve seen promising candidates lose interest because interview schedules stretched for weeks, decision makers disagreed about what they wanted, feedback was delayed, or the organization kept interviewing in hopes that someone clearly better might eventually appear.
Strong candidates rarely remain available indefinitely.
Passive candidates in particular are vulnerable to losing interest because they never needed to make a move in the first place. Their current employer may also respond with a promotion, additional compensation, or a counteroffer once it becomes clear they could leave.
A leadership recruiting firm should do more than introduce candidates. It should help keep the process moving, stay in touch with both sides and tell the client when something in the hiring process is putting good candidates at risk.
Sometimes the most valuable conversation I have during a search isn’t with a candidate. It’s with the hiring manager.
When You Need Access to the Market, Not Just a Resume Database
There is an important distinction between having access to candidate information and having access to candidates.
LinkedIn and other recruiting databases have made it possible to identify an enormous number of professionals.
That doesn’t mean those people will respond.
And it certainly doesn’t mean they will leave a good job.
The real work begins after someone has been identified.
Why might this opportunity be worth discussing? What would motivate the person to consider leaving? What concerns would prevent a move? Is the compensation competitive? Is the reporting relationship attractive? Does the candidate believe the organization can deliver what it is promising?
Technology can help identify people. It can’t create trust, understand someone’s motivation or give an accomplished leader a reason to seriously consider changing companies.
When You Probably Don’t Need a Leadership Recruiting Firm
There are also situations where I would not recommend using one.
If your internal team is already reaching the right people, you’re getting qualified applicants, and you have several candidates you’d genuinely consider hiring, an outside search may not add enough value.
The same is true when the organization has already identified several strong candidates through its own network.
Using a recruiting firm simply because a position carries a senior title doesn’t make sense.
The better question is:
What will an outside recruiting firm allow us to do that we cannot do effectively ourselves?
If there isn’t a compelling answer, you probably don’t need one.
Recruiter's Perspective
One of the warning signs I watch for is when a hiring team starts saying, “Maybe this is as good as we’re going to find.”
Sometimes that’s a realistic assessment.
But sometimes it means the search has been limited to the people who were easiest to find.
Those are not the same thing.
The candidate you ultimately hire doesn’t have to be actively looking when the search begins. Some of the best leadership placements start with someone saying, “I’m not looking, but I’ll listen.”
That’s the conversation a good search is designed to create.
It changes the hiring decision too. You’re no longer choosing only among the people who found your job posting. You’re also considering people you went out and found because their experience made them worth talking to.
Key Takeaways
- Not every leadership opening requires an outside recruiting firm.
- The strongest reason to use one is often access to candidates your current process isn’t reaching.
- A large applicant pool doesn’t necessarily mean you have a strong candidate pool.
- Long vacancies can cause hiring teams to lower the bar simply to get the position filled.
- Internal recruiting teams may have the ability to conduct the search but not the time required to do it well.
- A recruiting firm should help manage the hiring process, not just find candidates.
A Simple Test
If you’re deciding whether to engage a leadership recruiting firm, ask these five questions:
- Are we reaching the people we would most like to hire?
- Are the strongest candidates likely to apply on their own?
- What is this vacancy costing us while it remains unfilled?
- What happens if we hire the wrong person?
- Do we have the time and resources to conduct a targeted search ourselves?
If those questions expose a real gap between the candidates you’re seeing and the people you actually want to hire, posting the job again probably isn’t going to solve it.
That’s when an outside search can help you reach people you aren’t reaching today and start conversations with candidates who weren’t planning to change jobs.
That is when using one makes sense.
Next in the Leadership Recruiting Fundamentals Series
How the Leadership Recruiting Process Works
The next guide explains what happens after a leadership search begins—from defining the candidate profile and mapping the market to approaching passive candidates, evaluating fit, and managing the process through an accepted offer.
Continue Learning
Explore our core guides to leadership recruiting, the search process, and choosing the right recruiting partner.
Planning a Leadership Hire?
If you’re trying to fill a leadership or difficult-to-fill professional role, I’d be happy to talk through the search with you and share what we’re seeing in the market.